Skip to main content

Nitrogen+Syngas 368 Nov-Dec 2020

Incident No. 3: Backflow in pressurised leak detection system for loose liner of HP scrubber


UREAKNOWHOW.COM INCIDENT REPORT

Plant Manager+

This case study describes a backflow scenario in a pressurised leak detection system. Backflow can occur in case of a relatively large leak (crack in liner), where the flowmeter installed downstream of the equipment acts as a flow restriction, allowing pressure to build up.If the flowmeter is installed upstream of the equipment there is the risk of disconnected tubing going undetected.

Furthermore, in this case the process fluid did not contain urea and is less sensitive to clogging, even though it did. In cases where the process fluid contains urea the situation is even more critical.

From this incident it can be learned that a pressurised leak detection system requires tracing and insulation of all tubing in the leak detection circuits. However, this will only temporarily reduced the risk of clogging. In the opinion of the FIORDA team, an active vacuum leak detection system is a more reliable choice.

Carbamate in tubing of leak detection circuit due to backflow.
Fig. 1: Leak in pressurised leak detection system

Event description

In 2010, a 25-22-2 urea grade liner was installed on a 316L UG older overlay weld in the bottom of a HP scrubber dating from 1980. As the ammonia analyser was unavailable due to maintenance, the outlet vent of the pressurised leak detection system was checked for ammonia with a pocket ammonia analyser every four hours.

On one occasion, ammonia was detected and further investigation revealed that a lot of tubing had been clogged (see Fig. 1 and photo above). After opening the HP scrubber it was revealed that the liner showed cracks.

Immediate response action

The plant was stopped for further inspections. By analysing the tubing with more carbamate, it was concluded that backflow had occurred and contaminated the leak detection circuits of all three HP equipment items.

Causes

The leak rate was so large that the flowmeter acted as a flow restriction, pressure built up and backflow occurred leading to clogging of the leak detection circuits in all of the other high pressure equipment items.

Primary consequence

As a result of the timely shutdown the risk of a rupture was successfully avoided.

Secondary consequence

There was an unplanned shutdown, extensive work was required to clean and open all leak detection circuits and carry out a repair/relining job.

Risk level

The likelihood of a major consequence was moderate, but the risk level was high.

Prevention safeguards

Assure proper functioning of your leak detection system. Safe plant operation is only possible with a good working leak detection system, including an accurate and reliable ammonia analyser.

Mitigation safeguards

In case of a leak, confirm and locate the leak, shut down the plant and drain the synthesis section as soon as possible.

Corrective recommendation

The leak detection system was refurbished and made operational before start-up of the plant. All plant operators received renewed instructions. An inspection and maintenance program was also implemented to increase the reliability and availability of the existing leak detection system.

This case study report is one of many serious incident reports on UreaKnowHow.com’s Fertilizer Industry Operational Risks Database, FIORDA, which has been created for collecting and sharing process safety and reliability information among participating companies in the fertilizer industry.

Latest in Outlook & Reviews

CRU Phosphates+Potash conference focuses on sulphur

CRU’s Phosphates+Potash Expoconference was held in Paris in mid-April, with the Iran crisis uppermost in everyone’s mind. Margins are under pressure, sulphur has become a strategic constraint, and the phosphates investment pipeline is thin. CRU Principal Consultant Humphrey Knight examined the fallout from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, noting that fertilizers have been hit harder than most bulk commodities. A large share of exportable sulphur and traded urea normally originates in, or passes through, Gulf producers. The effective closure of the strait has squeezed the traded part of these markets, where international prices are set, and pushed benchmarks up sharply. The global phosphate market is structurally tight, and the combination of Chinese export policy and Middle East logistics has pushed the traded segment into a much more fragile state.

Supply crisis worsens

It is two months on from our previous issue, and almost none of the news has been good from sulphur and downstream markets. Only three sulphur cargoes are confirmed to have transited the Strait of Hormuz since the US and Israeli strikes on Iran began, all loaded at Ruwais, with destinations in India, Tanzania and Morocco, carrying a total of 160,000 tonnes. It is believed that a couple of Iranian vessels with a total of 75,000 tonnes may also have left covertly. But in spite of some Middle Eastern sulphur making its way to Saudi Red Sea ports or Duqm on Oman’s Indian Ocean coast, around 700,000 tonnes is still trapped on ships stranded in the Gulf, and coupled with production cuts in the region, it is estimated that over 1.2 million tonnes has so far been removed from the market.