Skip to main content

Sulphur 403 Nov-Dec 2022

Transporting sulphur safely


TRANSPORT

Transporting sulphur safely

Sulphur is a relatively safe and inert solid. However, it has a number of unique physical and chemical properties which can give rise to hazards, particularly during transport and handling.

Left: Dry bulk sulphur being transported by rail, Abu Dhabi.
PHOTO: ETIHAD RAIL

Sulphur falls under the UN RID dangerous goods code 4.1, classing it as a flammable substance. Sulphur burns readily and generates toxic sulphur dioxide when doing so. Normal fire prevention steps must thus be taken, such as forbidding naked flames around sulphur, and the restriction of cutting or welding equipment during normal operation. Electrical wiring and equipment must be properly protected and checked regularly.

Dust is the major hazard for handling dry sulphur. Solid sulphur is brittle and friable and can readily break down into smaller particles. Most organic dusts are combustible to a greater or lesser extent, but sulphur dust has a low ignition temperature of around 190°C or higher. It is also an excellent insulator, meaning that it can build up a static charge, and discharges can consequently cause ignition. In order to prevent sulphur dust explosions there are two basic strategies; to avoid suspensions of dust in the air, and to exclude sources of ignition.

Crushed bulk sulphur is the form most given to dust formation, so sulphur is usually formed into pastilles, granules etc, but these can also give rise to dust if poorly handled (see, e.g. ‘Airborne sulphur particulate in formed sulphur handling’, Sept/Oct 2015). Handling methods should therefore minimise dust formation by reducing the number of transfer points on conveyors to a minimum, using rubber belts conveyors or bucket elevators, properly earthed and minimising the use of front end loaders, which can crush sulphur under their wheels.

Good housekeeping is also a must. Operators need to develop and implement a hazardous dust inspection regime, with inspection of and cleaning of dust residues at regular intervals. Dust can also be suppressed by use of water sprays at transfer points and load-out stations. However, the effectiveness of water alone for dust control is limited by the hydrophobic nature of sulphur. This can be overcome by the use of special water-based chemical surfactants, provided that they are not used to excess.

Liquid sulphur

Sulphur is often transported as a liquid by rail and ship. By rail it is carried in insulated stainless steel tank cars which keep the sulphur at a temperature of 140°C. The Sulphur Institute has issued several sets of guidelines on sulphur rail cars, including a Molten Sulphur Rail Tank Car Guidance Document; Molten Sulphur Rail Tank Car Loading and Unloading Operations; and Guidelines on the Transportation Regulation of Molten Sulphur.

Liquid sulphur poses the greatest potential hazard during transfer. To avoid the possibility of an explosive concentration of sulphur vapour occurring, the temperature of liquid sulphur should not be allowed to exceed 154°C. The temperature however must also be maintained above 112°C to prevent the accumulation of solid sulphur crystals on internal tank surfaces exposed to air. Any sulphur deposits are corrosive to steel in the presence of moisture. As with solid sulphur, static charge build-up must be avoided.

Emissions

The other major hazard from both solid and liquid sulphur, is gaseous emissions, in particular, hydrogen sulphide. Direct from the Claus plant, sulphur typically contains around 300 ppmw H2 S which can be released during storage and/or transport, creating potentially hazardous conditions. Degassing the sulphur to reduce the H2 S content considerably reduces the potential hazards. In North America, sulphur degassing to <10 ppmw H2 S is regarded as best practice. All areas in which sulphur is stowed or used or which require the presence of personnel should be thoroughly ventilated.

Sea transport

The major issue for sea transport is corrosion. Dry bulk sulphur is not corrosive, but in the presence of water, sulphur can react with other elements. Sulphur is often loaded with a light water spray to keep down dust, or may otherwise be wet from rain when exposed in dockside storage. In a ship’s hold, water in the sulphur cargo can settle to the bottom or into the bilges, added to by any seawater that is able to enter the hold due to improperly tightened hatches. There are two processes in particular which can be problematic. The first is acidic corrosion, where sulphur-oxidising bacteria (thiobacilli) directly oxidise the sulphur to sulphate, and generate sulphuric acid. The acid can then react with iron in the steel of the hold. The presence of chlorides – in the form of salts, such as sodium and potassium chlorides, such as are found in seawater – accelerates this reaction.

A more serious mechanism is electrochemical corrosion of iron by wet sulphur, which can auto-catalyse under anaerobic conditions to produce ferrous sulphide (FeS). This is a blackish-brown sludge or jelly which can display pyrophoric behaviour – when exposed to oxygen, such as during discharge of the hold, it can create sufficient exothermal heat to start a fire.

When carrying sulphur cargoes, it is therefore essential that the hold be properly prepared. All residues from previous cargoes, as well as loose paint, rust or scale, should be removed. As holds are often cleaned with seawater, chlorides should also be removed, preferably by washing with fresh water to a ‘grain clear’ standard – i.e. as clean as would be required for transporting grain. Holds must be inspected and approved and hatches must be watertight. A lime wash is also generally applied to act as a barrier and protect the steel by neutralising acid formation.

Latest in Emissions

TotalEnergies to decarbonise its refineries in Northern Europe

TotalEnergies has signed agreements with Air Liquide to develop two projects in the Netherlands for the production and delivery of some 45,000 t/a of green hydrogen produced using renewable power, generated mostly by the OranjeWind offshore wind farm, developed by TotalEnergies (50%) and RWE (50%). These projects will cut CO2 emissions from TotalEnergies’ refineries in Belgium and the Netherlands by up to 450,000 t/a and contribute to the European renewable energy targets in transport.

Orica saves 1 million tonnes of CO2

Orica says it has achieved a decarbonisation milestone by eliminating 1.0 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) from its Kooragang Island site, the equivalent of taking 600,000 cars off the road. The emissions reduction is the result of deployment of tertiary abatement technology on three nitric acid plants, in a project co-financed by the New South Wales Government’s Net Zero Industry and Innovation Program and the Federal Government’s Clean Energy Finance Corporation. The Clean Energy Regulator also approved the project as eligible to generate Australian carbon credit units.

Producing sulphuric acid from gas streams with variable SO2

The first installed combination of a regenerative SO2 scrubbing system with a sulphuric acid plant using Worley Chemetics’ CORE™ reactor technology started up in November 2022. The combination of these technologies allows production of high-grade sulphuric acid from gases with low and/or fluctuating SO2 concentrations. C. Trujillo Sanchez and R. Dijkstra of Worley Chemetics report on the design concepts of this integrated process, highlight where it is most effective and report on the start-up and first years of operation of the plant.