Skip to main content

Nitrogen+Syngas 385 Sept-Oct 2023

Incentives for green production


GREEN PRODUCTION

Incentives for green production

The US Inflation Reduction Act has been a major step in terms of incentivising green syngas production, and has encouraged other governments to look at their own regulatory regimes.

Solar array at Baofeng Energy’s 450MW green hydrogen project, China.
PHOTO: BAOFENG ENERGY

The passage in August 2022 of the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is one of the largest public investment proposals in US history, and has been a game changer in terms of subsidies for green chemical production. The act establishes new incentives for low carbon hydrogen production and other technologies such as carbon capture, and allows for up to $369 billion in federal tax incentives for green energy investments.

As well as lowering the cost of renewable electricity, of particular interest to the syngas industry are the IRA’s tax credits for green hydrogen production, via the so-called provision 45V. Qualifying hydrogen production facilities can obtain a ten-year production tax credit of up to $3/kg beginning from the date that facility begins operation, though it is worth noting that the credits expire in 2033, so only facilities starting this year would gain the full ten years. The full $3 is also only available for production that results in less than 0.45kg CO2 per kg hydrogen in terms of life cycle emissions, with lower subsidies of $1/kg, $0.75/kg or $0.60/kg for more polluting technologies, up to a cap of 4kg CO2 /kg hydrogen, and also depends upon labour and wage standards being met.

The act also establishes a 45Q tax credit for facilities using carbon capture, utilisation or storage (CCUS), i.e. so-called blue hydrogen which lowers the thresholds at which projects can gain credits, in the case of industrial facilities from 100,000 t/a down to 12,500 t/a. There is also a section 48 which allows for investment tax credits (ITCs) for hydrogen producing facilities, again subject to how green the production is.

Many in the industry have said that it makes the US the best place to invest in green technology now, with the cost of green hydrogen production becoming possibly as low as $2/kg – the US Department of Energy has set the target for the green hydrogen price at $1/kg by the end of this decade.

Europe

The passage of the IRA initially caused some consternation in Europe, used to leading on environmental matters, where regulators have preferred to use carbon pricing and emissions limits as a way of forcing industry to go green (though often driving it overseas). The European Commission published its REPowerEU plan on 18 May 2022, which sets a target to increase the EU’s renewables share of power generation to 45% by 2030. The plan has an ambitious low-carbon hydrogen production target of 10 million t/a, with an additional 10 million t/a of imports by 2030. Refining and ammonia and methanol production are likely to be the major producers or consumers of green hydrogen, though these only represent around 5 million t/a of hydrogen production in the EU, so the 20 million t/a target envisages a large scale switch in other industries as well. The EU has allocated e41billion as part of the REPowerEU plan to switch from fossil fuels to alternatives and e27billion to develop key hydrogen infrastructure.

Elsewhere

India has also seen green hydrogen as a way of reducing its reliance on coal, and is said to be preparing a $2 billion incentive programme for the green hydrogen industry, aiming to reduce the production cost by 20% over the next five years. The Strategic Intervention for Green Hydrogen Transition (SIGHT) programme reportedly allocates $540 million for electrolyser manufacturing for five years and $1.6 billion for green hydrogen and green ammonia production for three years, with a production incentive of approximately $1/kg hydrogen. In February the government announced plans for India to make 5 million tonnes of green hydrogen annually by 2030, roughly equivalent to all of India’s current production for refining, fertilizer and steel manufacture.

But rather than private incentives, other countries are simply pushing government money into projects. Saudi Arabia is moving ahead with its NEOM project, which will include 1 GW of electrolyser capacity, via the backing of the Saudi sovereign wealth fund as well as a firm offtaker (codeveloper Air Products). And perhaps the most striking example is China, where around 1 GW of electrolyser capacity will be built this year alone. China does have the cheapest cheapest electrolysers in the world, and is also the world’s largest hydrogen producer, responsible for around one third of global hydrogen production (33 million t/a in 2020, most of it from coal and only 1% from renewables). The Chinese central government has set a production target of 100-200,000 t/a of renewable hydrogen per year by 2025, with renewable share of hydrogen production rising to approximately 15% by 2030 via the Midand-Long-Term Hydrogen Industrial Development Plan (2021-2035). The plan aims to achieve this by scaling up and increasing the productivity of Chinese production, facilitated by “supportive electricity prices” and the establishment of technical standards. It is believed that government support for hydrogen projects currently runs at around $10 billion per year.

Latest in Policy & Regulation

Acid leak into ship canal

Around 1 million gallons of sulphuric acid was released from an industrial facility, some of it into the Houston Ship Channel, in late December. A pipeline ruptured when an elevated walkway collapsed at the BWC Terminals facility in Channelview, east of Houston. Two people were transported to a hospital and subsequently released, while 44 others were treated and released at the scene. BWC Terminals said in a statement the majority of the sulphuric acid released was into a designated containment area, with a smaller, unknown amount entering the ship channel.

Sulphur ban extended

At the end of December, the Russian government extended its ban on the export of technical sulphur until at least the end of March 2026. The move prolongs the initial restrictions, which were first reported on 4 November and which were set to expire at the end of 2025. The initial ban was widely expected and followed early September drone strikes on the Astrakhan and Orenburg natural-gas plants. The official justification for the extension remains to “stabilise shipments of raw materials to the domestic market” and maintain production volumes for mineral fertilizers, according to the government’s press service Interfax.

Predicting the unpredictable

The start of the new year has shown that 2026 is already proving to be a very eventful one, beginning with the US abduction of Venezuela’s president Nicolas Maduro, which has prompted questions over production at the country’s ailing nitrogen assets, as well as the potential for a future boost to gas supplies to Trinidad. Meanwhile the Iranian government faces its most sustained public challenge since the 1979 revolution, and possible US military intervention, threatening continued exports from the country. In Europe, the future of fertilizers’ inclusion in the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has been thrown into doubt barely a week after the new regulations came into force, as France and Italy pushed for an exemption for crop nutrient imports.

Tecnimont wins damages against EuroChem

Maire Group says that, in relation to its ongoing dispute with Russian EuroChem Group, its subsidiary Tecnimont has obtained immediately enforceable orders for conservatory measures to freeze assets of EuroChem Group for an amount of approximately €1.1 billion. These measures are based on the leave granted to Tecnimont by the ICC Arbitral Tribunal seated in London, to seize EuroChem’s assets in every country, totalling €1.1 billion. Further seizure requests are underway in several jurisdictions. The Arbitral Tribunal has also found that Tecnimont is entitled to apply to judicial authorities to obtain asset freeze measures against EuroChem Group’s assets worldwide, by way of security for the further potential damages caused by EuroChem Group’s recent unlawful legal actions undertaken in Russia.